|
Index
|
Index
Hence a man leaves his father and mother and clings to his wife,
so that they become one flesh.
Genesis 2:24
The House of Desolation, the new-covenant church, and the Messianic Jews, are all characterised by their divisions. Jesus had this to say about disunity:
[25] If a house is divided against itself, that house cannot stand. (Mark 3:25 NIV)
Mark 3:25 contains an implicit warning of great magnitude. A divided house will be excluded from the Kingdom, resulting in the Death of all its members. And in John 17:20-21, Jesus is implying that fake unity simply will not cut it.
[Dissertation: Fake unity in the church today.]
It is worth noting that when Jesus mentions the unity between Himself and His Father, He is - at the same time - stating that they are existential individuals in their own right:
[20] “My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, [21] that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me. (John 17:20-21 NIV)
For the nature of the unity between Father and Son, see Trinity.
[Dissertation: The extent and scope of disunity within the church today (ie, the House of Desolation, the new-covenant church, and the Messianic Jews).]
[Dissertation: Disunity and its exponential growth.]
[20] “My prayer is not for them [His disciples] alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, [21] that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me. [22] I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one--- [23] I in them and you in me---so that they may be brought to complete unity. Then the world will know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me. [24] “Father, I want those you have given me to be with me where I am, and to see my glory, the glory you have given me because you loved me before the creation of the world. (John 17:20-24 NIV)
The Levitical Priesthood - or what passes for them today - have been reduced to the ranks because of their folly. They are allowed to carry out only the most menial tasks within David's Rebuilt Tent.
The Levitical priests have been superseded by the Priesthood in the Order of Melchizedek, priests after God's own heart.
There is currently no de facto Book of Teaching.
The bibles of the House of Desolation and the new-covenant are corrupt.
The problem is compounded by the many translations and interpretations which exist. This results in the error of 'slanting'.
Furthermore, where alternative sources exist, these are seldom quoted. And where they are quoted, then the evidence for the selected choice is not presented. For example, in the case of Mat.26:28, some translations cite 'new' as included in an alternative manuscript. The 1984 version of the NIV, together with the current version, specifically uses the term 'new-covenant' in verse Luke 22:20. The inconsistency breaks the integrity and consistency constraints imposed on the Covenant. And it bolsters Paul's evil declaration that:
[6] He has made us competent as ministers of a new covenant---not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life. (2 Corinthians 3:6 NIV)
The dilemma for the student is clear. Is the reference to the [Mosaic] Covenant or to Paul's new-covenant? Two very different outcomes having very different consequences! But because the terms appear in different books in the Bible, then the error of inconsistency remains hidden from view. Which, in turn, causes the inconsistency to be overlooked, and which predisposes to acceptance of the lies pedalled by Paul and the unknown writer to the Hebrews.
Jesus kills off any notion of 'new-covenant' when He categorically states:
[46] If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me. [47] But since you do not believe what he wrote, how are you going to believe what I say?” (John 5:46-47 NIV)
There is, then, an urgent need for a single Book of Teaching which will present the Scriptures in all truthfulness, having the authentification and backing of the Lord God Almighty and His Son. The language will be 'fixed', since it will be a literal translation as close to the original wording as it is possible. This will ensure that word-play and messages for later generations are picked up and acted upon. There will be none of the political correctness, wokery, and modernisation of the text we are seeing today with the Bible. As with all academic study, it is important to go right back to what was originally said and done.
All manuscript variations are to be listed and explained. Where a selection is made, then the underlying reasons must be clearly stated.
[Dissertation: Acceptabe and unacceptable doctrines.]
With the rebuilding of David's Fallen Tent, there will be a dramatic shift in worship.
With the rebuilding of David's Fallen Tent, there will be a major shift in outreach. The Covenant Model which Israel shall follow will be taken to the nations.
See 'marriage'.
Expect major changes here.
There will be but one Flock under the Messianically Amended Covenant.
With the rebuilding of David's Fallen Tent, Israel will cease to be a state. Instead, it will become a Kingdom of Priests obedient to the King of Kings.
With the change in state to a Kingdom, there will be radical change to the Administration [of Israel].
Version: 2024-07-11